An Evaluation Summary Method Based on a Combination of Content and Linguistic Metrics

نویسندگان

  • Samira Ellouze
  • Maher Jaoua
  • Lamia Hadrich Belguith
چکیده

This paper presents a new automated method for evaluating the content of a text summary. The proposed method is based on a combination of features encompassing scores of content and others of linguistic quality. This method relies on a learning technique called linear regression. The objective of this combination is to predict the PYRAMID score from the features used. In order to evaluate the presented method, we are interested in two levels of granularity evaluation: the first is named Microevaluation and proposes an evaluation of each summary while the second is called Macro-evaluation and it is applied at the level of each system. The resulting metric shows an improvement upon standard metrics by increasing the correlation with the PYRAMID metric.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Better Metrics to Automatically Predict the Quality of a Text Summary

In this paper we demonstrate a family of metrics for estimating the quality of a text summary relative to one or more human-generated summaries. The improved metrics are based on features automatically computed from the summaries to measure content and linguistic quality. The features are combined using one of three methods—robust regression, non-negative least squares, or canonical correlation...

متن کامل

Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Background Patient, public, consumer, and community (P2C2) engagement in organization-, community-, and systemlevel healthcare decision-making is increasing globally, but its formal evaluation remains challenging. To define a taxonomy of possible P2C2 engagement metrics and compare existing evaluation tools against this taxonomy, we conducted a systematic review.   Methods A broad search strate...

متن کامل

Mind the Gap: Dangers of Divorcing Evaluations of Summary Content from Linguistic Quality

In this paper, we analyze the state of current human and automatic evaluation of topic-focused summarization in the Document Understanding Conference main task for 2005-2007. The analyses show that while ROUGE has very strong correlation with responsiveness for both human and automatic summaries, there is a significant gap in responsiveness between humans and systems which is not accounted for ...

متن کامل

ارائه سیستم خلاصه ساز متون فارسی برمبنای ویژگی های زبان شناختی و رگرسیون

Considering the vast amount of existing written information and the shortage of time, optimal summarization of books, articles, news reports, etc. on the Web is a major concern of researchers. In this paper, we propose a new approach for Persian single-document Summarization based on several linguistic features of text. In our approach after extracting the linguistic features for each sentence,...

متن کامل

Dual function of first position nominal groups in research article titles: Describing methods and structuring summary

Previous research has identified the nominal group as the most distinctive feature of the research article title. In contrast, the findings reported in this paper suggest Theme/Rheme is the dominant structure in title text. Theme/Rheme structures order and tie nominal groups in titles. When a title starts with a methodological term the first position nominal group acts as a theme marker. Thus, ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013